Last Rights
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Last Rights” inside PodZeus.
This episode of the Astral Codex Ten podcast, titled 'Last Rites,' explores a satirical yet deeply thoughtful proposal to fix the dysfunction of the U.S. Congress by ratifying the unpassed Congressional Apportionment Amendment (CAA) from the original Bill of Rights. The amendment, which would dramatically expand the House of Representatives to around 6,641 members—making it the largest legislature in history—aims to combat gerrymandering, reduce the influence of large donors, and re-engage citizens with their representatives. The episode traces the amendment's history, from its near-ratification in 1789 to its revival decades later by a UT Austin student who successfully pushed it through as the 27th Amendment. The host argues that the CAA would make Congress more representative, less polarized, and more accountable, while also creating space for third parties. A key twist is a deliberate typo in the amendment’s third clause, which would make it logically impossible to follow under certain population levels—creating a potential constitutional showdown between textualism and originalism. The episode ends with a call to action: 27 states must ratify the amendment for it to become law, and the author urges state legislators to take the lead. The episode blends political satire with serious structural critique, using humor to highlight the absurdity of a system that resists reform while being fundamentally broken. It challenges the notion that Congress can fix itself, proposing instead a grassroots, state-led movement that bypasses federal inertia. The core takeaway is that real change may come not from within the system, but from outside it—through constitutional mechanisms that don’t require congressional consent. The tone is wry, hopeful, and intellectually playful, suggesting that even a paradoxical constitutional flaw could be the catalyst for democratic renewal.
The Congressional Apportionment Amendment, if ratified by 27 more states, would expand the House of Representatives to over 6,000 members, making it the largest legislature in history.
This expansion would reduce gerrymandering, dilute the influence of large donors, and make congressional elections more accessible and locally focused.
The amendment contains a deliberate typo that inverts its intended meaning under certain population levels, creating a potential constitutional crisis between textualism and originalism.
The path to ratification is viable—proven by the 27th Amendment—and requires only a coordinated effort by state legislatures.
Third parties could gain traction in a larger Congress, where winning a single seat becomes more achievable and visible.
The Crisis of Congressional Legitimacy
The episode opens with a critique of Congress's abysmal approval ratings, highlighting that the public distrusts Congress more than cockroaches. The host argues that the legislative branch's decline is due to systemic issues like gerrymandering, donor influence, and national polarization.
Why No Reform Will Work
The episode examines numerous proposed reforms—ranked choice voting, term limits, proportional representation—but concludes they all fail because they require congressional approval, which members have no incentive to give.
The 27th Amendment as Precedent
“The crusade worked. 34 years after the original paper, his political science teacher submitted a petition to the university to retroactively change his grade to an A+. Since there is no A+, on the official UT grading rubric, this became the only A-plus ever given in the history of the University of Texas.”
The Congressional Apportionment Amendment
“If you can effectively buy 1 in 435 elections, you've bought 0.23% of Congress. If the same money only buys you 0.02% of Congress, you're less incentivized to try and buy House elections.”
The Typo That Could Break the Constitution
“This wouldn't make things worse. Congress would be constitutionally barred from having more than 6,641 representatives, but this was hardly on the cards anyway.”
“We can have the largest legislative body in the world. We can build monuments again. We can have real third parties again. Either that or we'll turn the constitution into a paradox, and our government will vanish in a puff of logic.”
“The crusade worked. 34 years after the original paper, his political science teacher submitted a petition to the university to retroactively change his grade to an A+. Since there is no A+, on the official UT grading rubric, this became the only A-plus ever given in the history of the University of Texas.”
“If you can effectively buy 1 in 435 elections, you've bought 0.23% of Congress. If the same money only buys you 0.02% of Congress, you're less incentivized to try and buy House elections.”
Host
Guest
Scott Alexander
person
Congressional Apportionment Amendment
other
Astral Codex Ten
media
27th Amendment
other
California
other
David Spicer
person
Gregory Watson
person
Texas
other
Donald Trump
person
University of Texas at Austin
organization
Next-Token Predictor Is An AI's Job, Not Its Species
Astral Codex Ten Podcast • 16m • 4/2/2026
"All Lawful Use": Much More Than You Wanted To Know
Astral Codex Ten Podcast • 19m • 4/2/2026
Mantic Monday: Groundhog Day
Astral Codex Ten Podcast • 30m • 4/2/2026
SEIU Delenda Est
Astral Codex Ten Podcast • 13m • 4/17/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Last Rights” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
