Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook

Columbia Energy Exchange1h 0mMarch 31, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this episode of Columbia Energy Exchange, Jason Bordoff sits down with Daleep Singh, former Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics and current Vice Chair and Chief Global Economist at PGM, to discuss the urgent need for a structured U.S. industrial policy playbook. Singh argues that the era of market fundamentalism is over, and that targeted, disciplined government intervention is now essential to address market failures in critical sectors like clean energy, critical minerals, and advanced technology. Drawing on historical examples like DARPA and Operation Warp Speed, he emphasizes that successful industrial policy must be mission-driven, time-bound, and grounded in clear strategic objectives. He critiques the current ad-hoc nature of U.S. economic statecraft—encompassing tariffs, sanctions, and subsidies—and calls for a formal doctrine, institutional mechanisms like a sovereign wealth fund, and greater transparency to ensure accountability and long-term competitiveness. Singh also warns against the overuse of coercive tools like sanctions, which risk eroding the global dominance of the U.S. dollar and weakening international alliances. He advocates for a balanced approach that combines positive tools—like long-term investment vehicles and public-private partnerships—with strategic controls to counter China’s state-driven economic model, especially its use of overcapacity to undercut global competitors. The conversation underscores the need for a new framework that aligns economic, national, and energy security in an era of geopolitical fragmentation and technological competition.

Key Takeaways
1

Industrial policy must be mission-driven, time-bound, and grounded in a theory of market failure to avoid creating monopolies or permanent dependence on public support.

2

The U.S. needs a formal doctrine for economic statecraft—sanctions, tariffs, export controls—to prevent overuse and maintain global credibility and alliance cohesion.

3

A sovereign wealth fund or strategic investment vehicle could help the U.S. deploy patient capital for long-term, high-risk innovations like fusion, advanced geothermal, and neuromorphic computing.

4

China’s overcapacity in clean energy and critical minerals is not just a supply issue but a strategic weapon designed to flood markets, undercut competitors, and distort global trade.

5

The U.S. must balance domestic production incentives with international partnerships and targeted tariffs to ensure investments are not undermined by unfair competition.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
10 min

The End of Market Fundamentalism

I think the premise of industrial policy, you know, by the time I came back into government at the White House, I had already come to the conclusion that, look, market failures absolutely exist. I'd seen them firsthand in the private sector and the public sector.

Highlight
10:00
10 min

The Case for a Frameworked Industrial Policy

You know, I don't think the goal of any of these interventions should be permanent dependence on public support. The government's role, I think, should shrink as private capital scales up and markets mature.

Highlight
20:00
10 min

The Rise of Economic Statecraft and Its Risks

The more you use sanctions, the more resistance will build. And so, of course, if you want to go maximalist, you can extract concessions... but there is a long-term cost you are borrowing from the future.

Highlight
30:00
10 min

China’s Overcapacity as a Strategic Weapon

China is flooding strategic sectors with supply well beyond what global demand can plausibly absorb. And therefore, it's wiping out the competition.

Highlight
40:00
20 min

Building a New U.S. Economic Security Architecture

Singh advocates for a sovereign wealth fund, strategic stockpiles, and public-private partnerships to mobilize long-term capital. He emphasizes the need for collaboration across government, industry, and academia to rebuild resilient, innovative supply chains.

High-Impact Quotes
The more you use sanctions, the more resistance will build. And so, of course, if you want to go maximalist, you can extract concessions... but there is a long-term cost you are borrowing from the future.
Daleep Singh32:20
Viral: 90.0
China is flooding strategic sectors with supply well beyond what global demand can plausibly absorb. And therefore, it's wiping out the competition.
Daleep Singh54:27
Viral: 88.0
We have the most to lose. It undermines, erodes the strength of the dollar in the long term or other countries de-risk and reduce their exposure to our coercive force.
Daleep Singh30:48
Viral: 86.0
Speakers

Host

Jason Bordoff

Guest

Daleep Singh
Topics Discussed
industrial policy95%supply chain resilience92%economic statecraft90%china's overcapacity89%energy security88%geopolitical competition87%clean energy transition86%sovereign wealth fund85%
People & Brands

China

place

28xNegative

Biden administration

organization

15xPositive

Russia

place

12xNegative

Daleep Singh

person

12xPositive

Trump administration

organization

10xMixed

G7

organization

8xPositive

Jason Bordoff

person

8xPositive

Inflation Reduction Act

other

6xPositive

CHIPS Act

other

5xPositive

G20

organization

4xNeutral

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime