Big Tech Won: How Trump Failed to Stop Foreign Worker Replacement 11 Years Later | 6/12/26
Eleven years after Trump's 2015 escalator speech promising to put American workers first, Daniel Horowitz delivers a scathing indictment of the GOP's failure to deliver on immigration reform—especially regarding foreign worker visas. Despite a Republican trifecta, no major legislation has been passed to restrict H-1B visas, curb the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, or strip courts of jurisdiction over immigration. Horowitz argues that Trump’s administration, far from being a conservative disruptor, has actively enabled big tech’s dominance by protecting foreign labor pipelines, even reversing earlier reforms. His guest, John Miano—a 30-year veteran of immigration law and computer programming—reveals how executive overreach and judicial complicity have turned the H-1B and OPT programs into tools for replacing American workers, with 50,000 foreign tech workers imported in one year alone while only 40,000 domestic jobs were created. The episode exposes a systemic collapse: Congress is paralyzed, courts ignore precedent, and even conservative lawmakers now support policies that undermine American labor. Horowitz concludes with a radical call for constitutional resistance—state interposition, defiance of federal overreach, and a new movement inspired by the American Revolution’s principles of consent and sovereignty—warning that without it, the U.S. faces a slow-motion French Revolution.
H-1B visas now allow more foreign workers to enter than the U.S. creates domestic computer jobs annually—50,000 foreign workers imported vs. 40,000 new domestic jobs in one year.
The Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, expanded in 2007 via a secret Microsoft-DHS deal, now serves as the largest foreign employment pipeline, with no congressional oversight.
The Trump administration not only failed to reform foreign labor programs but actively defended Obama-era expansions of H-4 EAD (spouse work rights) and OPT in Supreme Court briefs.
Federal courts have repeatedly ignored immigration law and precedent, ruling that Congress has no control over non-immigrants once they enter the U.S.—a doctrine that enables executive overreach.
American workers are locked out of entire industries not just by numbers, but by cultural gerrymandering: once a critical mass of foreign workers enters, hiring becomes biased toward them, even in technical interviews conducted from India.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
The 11-Year Betrayal: Trump's Escalator Promise Unfulfilled
“We're going to talk about... the merging of the two biggest issues, economy and immigration, and how dealing with the disenfranchised American worker could have been the issue not just to accomplish the electoral mandate from 10 and 2 years ago, not just to rally the base, but actually would have gotten a lot of people in the middle as well.”
The H-1B Crisis: More Foreign Workers Than Jobs
“Last year, the United States created a little over 40,000 computer jobs. We imported over 50,000 computer workers on H1B visas alone last year. So, on that one visa program, we've imported more workers than we're creating jobs.”
The OPT Scam: How Microsoft Bypassed Congress
“Microsoft threw a dinner party for DHS secretary Chertoff and pitched the idea of expanding this to three years. And so then it could serve as a substitute for H-1B, which is also a three year program. They then churn off.”
Trump’s Double-Standard: Rhetoric vs. Reality
Despite early rhetoric about protecting American workers, Trump’s administration defended Obama-era foreign labor expansions in Supreme Court briefs, including H-4 EAD and OPT. The $100,000 H-1B fee was a symbolic gesture that excluded most applicants.
The Court’s Role: Judicial Supremacy as a Cudgel
Federal courts have repeatedly ignored immigration law, ruling that Congress has no control over non-immigrants once they enter the U.S. This enables executive overreach and nullifies legislative intent.
“You gotta aggressively, you know, look, the American Revolution was a shooting war, but I'm saying, I'm talking about just electing people with the guts to assert 10th amendment, to take the structure that Hamilton and Madison already said in federalist papers, that if the federal government would usurp power, you would ignore it. And just follow that.”
“The only vestige of the Constitution we have left is where they use federal preemption and Supreme Court rulings built upon the fiction of judicial supremacism as a one directional cudgel.”
“You know, Trump was viciously fighting to defend Obama programs for allowing foreign labor into the United States.”
Host
Guest
Daniel Horowitz
person
Donald Trump
person
John Miano
person
Supreme Court
organization
DHS
organization
OPT
other
Center for Immigration Studies
organization
Microsoft
organization
H-4 EAD
other
10th Amendment
other
It Could Happen Here Weekly 234
3h 32m • 5/30/2026
From Tehran to the Border Trump Bets Big on Strength Strategy
33m • 5/30/2026
Lawfare Daily: The Trials of the Trump Administration, May 29
1h 33m • 6/1/2026
#309 Megyn Kelly - "I Now Have to Worry About Getting Shot Because of My Opinion"
3h 26m • 6/1/2026
Americano: who is Usha Vance?
23m • 6/1/2026
The Blueprint to Beat the Uniparty: Zach Lahn’s Historic Iowa Upset | 6/3/26
1h 0m • 6/3/2026
How Big Tech Is Transforming America Without Your Consent | 6/9/26
57m • 6/9/2026
Conservatives Can't Beat the Left Until They Defeat the GOP | 6/10/26
57m • 6/10/2026
Are the Belfast Riots the Start of a European Uprising Against the Islamic Takeover? | 6/11/26
1h 14m • 6/11/2026
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime

