Abortion Access In The High Court, Again | Katie Keith
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Abortion Access In The High Court, Again | Katie Keith” inside PodZeus.
This episode of Health Affairs This Week examines the ongoing legal battle over access to mifepristone, the primary medication used in medication abortion, as it reaches the Supreme Court for the second time in recent years. Katie Keith, a former Biden administration official and expert on reproductive health policy, explains how the FDA’s 2023 rule changes—allowing telehealth and pharmacy access to mifepristone—have been challenged by Louisiana’s Republican Attorney General and a private plaintiff. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals quickly granted emergency relief, effectively halting nationwide access to telehealth and pharmacy-based mifepristone, sparking widespread disruption. The Supreme Court is now deciding whether to extend an administrative stay that temporarily preserves current access while litigation continues. Keith emphasizes that the drug has been safely used for over 25 years and that the FDA’s decisions were science-driven, not politicized. She warns that allowing one state to use litigation to impose nationwide restrictions on a widely used drug could destabilize the entire prescription drug development ecosystem. The episode also traces the long history of legal challenges to mifepristone, including prior cases dismissed for lack of standing and new lawsuits from multiple Republican-led states. Keith highlights the broader implications: if states can block access to a safe, effective medication based on ideological objections, it sets a dangerous precedent for all pharmaceutical innovation. The Trump administration’s quiet stance—neither defending nor challenging the FDA’s rules—suggests political calculation, possibly to avoid controversy ahead of the 2026 election. Despite the chaos, the drug manufacturers have intervened to defend access, signaling confidence in the drug’s safety and the importance of maintaining patient access. The outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision will determine whether millions of women face renewed barriers to a foundational reproductive health tool.
Mifepristone has been safely used for over 25 years and is now accessible via telehealth and pharmacies in many states, a change finalized by the FDA in 2023.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently suspended nationwide telehealth and pharmacy access to mifepristone, creating widespread disruption.
The Supreme Court is deciding whether to extend an administrative stay that preserves current access while the legal battle continues.
The FDA’s 2023 changes were based on scientific evidence and long-standing practice, not political interference, as confirmed by internal agency documents.
Allowing one state to use litigation to impose nationwide restrictions on a drug could undermine pharmaceutical innovation and patient access across all medical fields.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introduction and Context
Jeff Byers introduces the episode, previews an upcoming antitrust event, and welcomes Katie Keith and Chris Fleming to discuss the latest developments in the mifepristone litigation.
Mifepristone Access and FDA Regulation
Katie Keith explains the history and safety of mifepristone, emphasizing that it has been FDA-approved for over 25 years and that telehealth and pharmacy access were established during the pandemic and made permanent in 2023.
The Louisiana Lawsuit and Fifth Circuit Decision
“One state that has some of the most extreme abortion bans in the country can use the courts to make sudden, sweeping nationwide changes to how this drug... is regulated and available to women should give everyone pause.”
Supreme Court Intervention and the Stay
“All eyes today are very much on the Supreme Court asking, you know, will they or won't they?”
Broader Implications and Future Outlook
“We'll have to be developing drugs while looking over our shoulder out of fear that there could be states that sue because they don't like what our drug does or how it's being used.”
“We'll have to be developing drugs while looking over our shoulder out of fear that there could be states that sue because they don't like what our drug does or how it's being used.”
“This case is not just about abortion—it’s a pivotal moment for the future of evidence-based regulation and drug development in the U.S.”
“One state that has some of the most extreme abortion bans in the country can use the courts to make sudden, sweeping nationwide changes to how this drug... is regulated and available to women should give everyone pause.”
Host
Guest
Mifepristone
product
Katie Keith
person
Food and Drug Administration
organization
Supreme Court of the United States
other
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
other
Trump Administration
organization
Louisiana Attorney General
person
Jeff Byers
person
Chris Fleming
person
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
other
Abandon High‑Deductible Health Plans Linked to Health Spending Accounts | Jeanne Lambrew
Health Affairs This Week • 14m • 4/3/2026
2027 Medicare Advantage Final Payment Rule: Key Changes Explained | David Meyers
Health Affairs This Week • 16m • 4/8/2026
Health Policy Roundup: ACA Reform, MedPAC & Conversion Therapy in the Courts
Health Affairs This Week • 15m • 4/10/2026
The FY 2027 HHS Budget Proposal: Changes, Cuts, and Investments
Health Affairs This Week • 11m • 4/17/2026
New Prior Authorization Proposals: Implications for Prescription Drug Access
Health Affairs This Week • 12m • 4/24/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Abortion Access In The High Court, Again | Katie Keith” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
