Tour Auvergne - Rhône-Alpes Stage 3 (TTT)

Lanterne Rouge Cycling Podcast35mJune 9, 2026
AI-Generated Summary

The Lanterne Rouge Cycling Podcast delivers a sharp, data-driven breakdown of Stage 3 of the Tour Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes — a 28km hilly team time trial from Pérouges to Pérouges that proved to be a pivotal moment in the race’s GC dynamics. The episode centers on the dramatic collapse of Ineos Grenadiers after Oscar Onley’s chain drop, a mechanical that cost them the stage by nine seconds despite leading at multiple splits. The hosts dissect pacing strategies across teams, highlighting how Visma’s tactical discipline and strong final climb performance allowed them to reclaim time, while UAE’s inconsistent effort and lack of a true 'truck' rider (like Holo or Tarling) left them mid-pack. A standout moment comes when the hosts debate whether Red Bull intentionally sacrificed Luke Tuckwell on the final climb — a move that raises eyebrows given his GC status. The episode also dives into the broader implications for the upcoming Tour de France TTT, comparing the Dauphiné’s technical, multi-climb course to the flatter, city-based Barcelona stage. With teams like Ineos and Visma now in prime GC position, and UAE’s Tour roster still unconfirmed, the hosts predict a high-stakes, data-heavy TTT showdown. The recap ends with a speculative, humorous take on how teams might use extreme tactics — like night-time TTTs or solo Remco Evenepoel sprints — to gain an edge. The episode’s most provocative insight?

Key Takeaways
1

Ineos Grenadiers lost the stage due to a chain drop on Oscar Onley, costing them 9 seconds and likely the win despite leading at multiple splits.

2

Visma’s tactical discipline and strong final climb performance allowed them to gain 16 seconds on Ineos, putting them in prime GC position.

3

Red Bull’s decision to let Luke Tuckwell drop on the final climb suggests a planned tactical sacrifice of their GC rider for team cohesion.

4

The 28km hilly TTT course made pacing extremely complex, with teams struggling to balance hill effort, flat speed, and mechanical risk.

5

Team time trial success now hinges less on raw power and more on strategic risk management, team composition, and psychological resilience.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Stage 3 Recap: The Hilly TTT That Changed Everything

The hosts introduce the stage 3 team time trial, emphasizing its difficulty due to three climbs, technical descents, and a 400-meter elevation gain over 28km. They set the stage for a high-stakes race where strategy and reliability would be as important as speed.

2:00
2 min

Ineos’ Chain Drop: The Moment That Cost Them the Stage

I think it costs them the stage. I think so too. Because... Maybe you can do some calculation that they technically lose seven seconds in speed. The disruption, the mental effect, just changing your physical, like what's happening to your body afterwards, it's got to be worth 10 seconds. It has to be.

Highlight
4:00
3 min

Visma’s Tactical Mastery and the Final Climb Surge

So basically at the foot of the climb, Visma Lisa bike was one second faster than that company Ineos by the foot of the climb. So that's after the mechanical and so forth, which means that eight seconds is what Jorgensen took on the final climb on Ineos.

Highlight
7:00
3 min

Red Bull’s Suspect Strategy: Was Tuckwell Sacrificed?

To me, it's very clear that... Tuckwell's their GC guy. They literally blew up Tuckwell on the final climb as in like a planned blow-up. Really? Like he did the lead out? Yeah, he did the lead out and went to the side.

Highlight
10:00
4 min

Team Composition Matters: The ‘Truck’ Factor

The hosts stress that teams with strong, heavy riders (‘trucks’) like Holo and Tarling have a massive advantage in hilly TTTs. UAE and Red Bull are criticized for lacking such riders.

High-Impact Quotes
I legit think, is that not quicker? Lipovic is there, Patrick. Remco is not obvious leader at the Sto de France. If anything, Lipovic is more proven. Lipovic is the leader on paper.
Remco28:45
I think it costs them the stage. I think so too. Because... Maybe you can do some calculation that they technically lose seven seconds in speed. The disruption, the mental effect, just changing your physical, like what's happening to your body afterwards, it's got to be worth 10 seconds. It has to be.
Patrick8:48
So basically at the foot of the climb, Visma Lisa bike was one second faster than that company Ineos by the foot of the climb. So that's after the mechanical and so forth, which means that eight seconds is what Jorgensen took on the final climb on Ineos.
Remco15:30
Speakers

Hosts

PatrickRemco
Topics Discussed
team time trial strategy95%cycling team composition90%tour de france team time trial88%cycling mechanical failures85%cycling pacing strategy80%cycling GC dynamics75%cycling breakaway tactics70%cycling sprint finishes65%
People & Brands

ineos grenadiers

other

18xNeutral

visma lease a bike

other

16xNeutral

tour auvergne-rhône-alpes

other

15xNeutral

tour de france

other

14xNeutral

uae team

other

12xNeutral

dauphiné

other

12xNeutral

patrick

person

12xNeutral

remco

person

10xNeutral

red bull

other

10xNeutral

oscar onley

person

8xNeutral

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime