Tamihere court decision puts the case back at square one
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Tamihere court decision puts the case back at square one” inside PodZeus.
The RNZ podcast episode examines the landmark Supreme Court decision that quashed David Tamahiri's 1990 murder convictions in the 1989 disappearance of Swedish backpackers Heidi Parkinen and Urban Hoglin, nearly 37 years after the crime. Despite no bodies being found at the time of his original trial, Tamahiri was convicted based on jailhouse snitch testimony and eyewitness accounts. Over decades, key evidence unraveled—Urban's body was found 70km from the original crime scene, and crucially, his watch was still on the remains, contradicting claims that Tamahiri had taken it. A 2017 private prosecution proved one jailhouse snitch lied, and a 2023 affidavit from property developer Sir Bob Jones alleged that lead detective John Hughes confessed to framing Tamahiri. After the Court of Appeal upheld the conviction in 2024 with a new theory, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned it, ruling the trial was fundamentally unfair and requiring a retrial. The decision highlights systemic resistance to admitting error, with justice only advancing through persistent efforts by journalists, campaigners, and whistleblowers. The case now returns to the Crown, which must decide whether to pursue a retrial against a now 72-year-old man, amid concerns over lost evidence, deceased witnesses, and the emotional toll on victims’ families in Sweden.
The Supreme Court quashed David Tamahiri's convictions after 37 years, citing a fundamentally unfair trial and the need for a new jury to assess the Crown's revised case.
Critical evidence, including the discovery of Urban Hoglin’s body far from the original crime scene and the intact watch, undermined the original prosecution case.
A 2017 private prosecution exposed perjury by a jailhouse snitch, a pivotal moment that led to Tamahiri’s Royal Prerogative of Mercy appeal and eventual retrial.
The case reveals systemic resistance to admitting mistakes—justice was only advanced through external pressure from journalists, campaigners, and whistleblowers.
The Crown now faces a difficult decision: pursue a retrial against an elderly man with 37-year-old evidence, or accept that the case may never be resolved.
The Long Road to Justice: 37 Years of a Wrongful Conviction
“It just says that it's a system that doesn't like to contemplate that it's made a mistake, and it's left to other people, not the authorities, not the police, not the Crown, to push for the right questions to be asked.”
The Disappearance of Heidi and Urban: A Case That Shook New Zealand
The episode details the 1989 disappearance of Swedish backpackers Heidi Parkinen and Urban Hoglin on the Coromandel Peninsula, their last known sightings, and the discovery of their car at the end of Taru Creek Road.
The Flawed Conviction: No Bodies, Jailhouse Snitches, and a Shifting Narrative
“Urban's body is somehow 70 kilometres away. But even more interesting was that at David Tamahiri's trial, witnesses and the police said that David Tamahiri had taken Urban Hoglin's watch off him and had given it to his son... But when the body was discovered, Urban's watch was still on his remains.”
The Rise of the Jailhouse Lawyer: Arthur Taylor and the Fight for Truth
“The jury decided that Conchie Harris' evidence at Tamahiri's trial was perjury, and Harris was sentenced to eight years in jail.”
The Crown’s New Theory and the Court of Appeal’s 2024 Decision
In 2023, the Crown presented a new scenario placing Tamahiri on the East Coast where Urban’s body was found. The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction in 2024, claiming enough evidence remained to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
“Urban's body is somehow 70 kilometres away. But even more interesting was that at David Tamahiri's trial, witnesses and the police said that David Tamahiri had taken Urban Hoglin's watch off him and had given it to his son... But when the body was discovered, Urban's watch was still on his remains.”
“We're not saying that David Tamahiri is innocent. We're just saying that his trial was fundamentally unfair and that the new case that's been brought by the Crown... hasn't been tested in front of a jury.”
“It just says that it's a system that doesn't like to contemplate that it's made a mistake, and it's left to other people, not the authorities, not the police, not the Crown, to push for the right questions to be asked.”
Host
Guest
David Tamahiri
person
Mike White
person
Urban Hoglin
person
Supreme Court of New Zealand
organization
Heidi Parkinen
person
Court of Appeal
organization
Roberto Conchi Harris
person
John Hughes
person
Sir Bob Jones
person
Arthur Taylor
person
The pros and cons of single-sex state schools
RNZ - All Programmes • 11m • 4/7/2026
The Panel with Jo McCarroll and David Downs, Part 2
RNZ - All Programmes • 23m • 4/7/2026
Midweek - BSA extends reach, a bad week for Big Tech, breakfast with Tova and an easter chocolate ban
RNZ - All Programmes • 25m • 4/7/2026
Hannah Lillith Assadi discusses her exiled Palestinian father
RNZ - All Programmes • 20m • 4/7/2026
Former IEA boss warns how high oil might go
RNZ - All Programmes • 13m • 4/7/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Tamihere court decision puts the case back at square one” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
