S8 Ep957: (13) Peter Berkowitz examines two distinct intellectual critiques of the United States as it approaches its 250th anniversary: the postmodern progressives and the post-liberal right. The progressives argue that America is mired in systemic oppression and
Peter Berkowitz of the Hoover Institution joins John Batchelor to dissect two radical intellectual critiques of America as it approaches its 250th anniversary: postmodern progressives and the post-liberal right. The postmodern progressives argue that America’s founding principles—liberty, equality, and individual rights—are not solutions but the root of systemic oppression based on race, sex, and class. They see progress as illusory, dismissing America’s scientific, engineering, and democratic achievements as masking deep-seated injustice. In contrast, the post-liberal right blames the same founding ideals for America’s moral decline, claiming that the abandonment of religious virtue and the absence of a transcendent authority have led to decadence. They advocate for an active government role in promoting religion and moral cultivation—despite the nation’s historical foundation on religious freedom and separation of church and state. Berkowitz dismantles both critiques: he exposes the post-liberal right’s historical amnesia about America’s anti-establishment religious roots, and challenges the progressives’ dismissal of America’s actual progress. The episode reveals a deeper tension: America is being judged not by what it has achieved, but by what it has failed to become—by ideals that are both aspirational and, in some eyes, unattainable.
Postmodern progressives view America’s founding principles as the source of systemic oppression, not the solution to injustice.
The post-liberal right blames America’s moral decay on the abandonment of religious virtue and calls for government to actively promote salvation.
America’s founding was rooted in protecting religion from government interference, not merging the two.
The First Amendment was designed to safeguard religious liberty by keeping the federal government out of religious affairs.
Both critiques fail to acknowledge the real progress America has made over 250 years, despite their divergent diagnoses.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
America at 250: A Nation of Contradictions
“They are on a horse riding hard, announcing that the U.S. has a lot to do after 250 years to make up for its sins, its errors and its blindness.”
The Postmodern Progressive Critique: Founding Principles as the Problem
Berkowitz explains how postmodern progressives reject America’s foundational ideals of liberty and equality, arguing they perpetuate systemic oppression based on race, sex, and class.
The Post-Liberal Right: Religion, Virtue, and the Need for Government Intervention
The post-liberal right blames America’s moral decline on the absence of religious authority and calls for government to actively promote virtue and salvation.
The Historical Reality: America Was Founded on Religious Freedom, Not State Religion
“The First Amendment was designed to safeguard religious liberty by keeping the federal government out of religious affairs.”
The Irony of the Post-Liberal Right: Calling for Government to Save Religion
Berkowitz highlights the contradiction in the post-liberal right’s vision: advocating for state-led religious revival while ignoring the historical foundation of religious freedom.
“But I think you put your finger on the point, John, that they have a poor grasp of history. What they fail to understand is that the dominant religious sensibility that founded this country believed that one of the great protections of religion was to keep the central government out of it to the extent possible.”
“The post -liberal right turns to the past. They turn to Aristotle, they turn to Cicero, they turn to Thomas Aquinas for actually more than guidance, for instruction in how to establish a political regime that will finally devote itself to... cultivating virtue and directing human beings to salvation.”
“They believe that America is mired in systemic, well, different systemic things. Some say systemic class oppression. Some say systemic oppression based on sex. Some say systemic oppression based on race.”
Host
Guest
Peter Berkowitz
person
John Batchelor
person
Quakers
organization
Trinity Sunday
other
Sparta
place
Hoover Institution
organization
Puritans
organization
Methodists
organization
Aristotle
person
Cicero
person
S8 Ep967: STREAMING THE MAKING OF JBS, FEATURING CHANG, GRANT, HAROLD, YATES, 6-3-2026 1865 BRAZIL IRONCLAD
49m • 6/4/2026
S8 Ep1018: Professor John Yoo critiques the "Thucydides Trap" analogy used by Xi Jinping to describe US-China tensions. He argues China resembles militaristic Sparta, while the US represents the democratic, commercial Athens. Yoo warns that China's declining populat
15m • 6/17/2026
S8 Ep946: STREAMING THE MAKING OF THE JBS, FEATURING BLISS AND VLAHOS. 5-29-2026 1890 TROJAN WAR.
58m • 5/30/2026
S8 Ep947: SCHEDULE THE JBS, 5-29-26. 457 THE AMBROSIAN ILIAD.R
58m • 5/30/2026
S8 Ep948: (3) James Tabor analyzes the Protevangelium of James, a mid-second-century text that established the tradition of Mary's perpetual virginity and her upbringing as a "vestal-like" figure in the temple. He contrasts this theological portrait with the histor
12m • 5/31/2026
S8 Ep948: (1) James Tabor introduces the historical Mary through the city of Sepphoris, the urban capital of Galilee located just miles from Nazareth. Unlike the small village of Nazareth, Sepphoris was a bustling Roman "jewel" where Mary was born to parents Joachi
12m • 5/31/2026
S8 Ep948: (5) James Tabor describes Mount Zion in Jerusalem as the world headquarters of the early movement. Archaeological evidence suggests the "Upper Room" sits atop a first-century foundation of a house-synagogue. In this space, Mary served as a matriarch and h
10m • 5/31/2026
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime

