798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of The History of Literature, host Jack Wilson interviews David Womersley, Thomas Wharton Professor of English Literature at Oxford, about his book *Thinking Through Shakespeare*. Womersley argues that Shakespeare remains enduringly relevant not because he offers definitive answers about human nature, but because he masterfully explores four perennial philosophical questions: identity, the tension between civilization and barbarism, the relationship between political power and religious authority, and the conflict between moral intuition and utilitarian expediency. He challenges the late 20th-century theoretical turn in literary studies that dismissed the idea of universal human nature, asserting instead that while human behavior varies across time and space, core human concerns—like love, power, justice, and moral ambiguity—remain constant. Womersley uses *King Lear* and *Measure for Measure* to illustrate how Shakespeare presents opposing moral frameworks without resolving them, allowing audiences to wrestle with the complexity of ethical dilemmas. He praises Shakespeare’s genius for avoiding dogma, calling it a form of intellectual freedom. The episode concludes with a reflective conversation with Ramie Targoff, who shares her choice for her last book: George Eliot’s *Middlemarch*, which she sees as a profound, compassionate, and endlessly revealing novel that grows with the reader across a lifetime. Together, the discussions affirm literature’s power not to provide answers, but to deepen our capacity for thoughtful, empathetic engagement with the human condition.
Shakespeare’s enduring power lies not in offering moral answers, but in posing timeless philosophical questions with profound depth and balance.
The late 20th-century theoretical turn in literary studies, which questioned the idea of universal human nature, has contributed to declining interest in literature courses.
Core human concerns—identity, civilization vs. barbarism, power vs. religion, and right vs. expedient—are not resolved in Shakespeare’s plays, but are presented as intractable and constitutive of the human experience.
Shakespeare’s genius is his ability to hold opposing moral positions without taking sides, allowing audiences to reflect rather than be indoctrinated.
Reading *Middlemarch* in later life offers new insights, showing how great literature evolves with the reader and provides companionship through wisdom and empathy.
Introduction and Tour Context
Host Jack Wilson introduces the episode as a bonus installment ahead of the History of Literature podcast tour to England, where he and producer Emma will meet David Womersley and other literary scholars. He previews the dual interview with Womersley on Shakespeare and Jonathan Swift.
The Decline of Literary Study and the Rise of Theory
“I think that it's not the whole explanation for why that's happened but a contributory course certainly was this hyper-skeptical theoretical encroachment on literary study.”
Human Nature: Universal or Socially Constructed?
“We still have mothers who love children. We still have men and women falling in love. We still have jealousy.”
Shakespeare as a Thinker, Not a Teacher
“Shakespeare himself was not undivided on these questions... he is right in the middle of these questions. But somehow, and this is where I think he is so distinctive, somehow does not feel obliged to take a side.”
The Perennial Question: Right vs. Expedient
“In the case of King Lear, it's a vicious flexibility that allows people to be treated as just tools or expedients or means to an end. But in Measure for Measure, treating people like a means to an end actually produces a kind of relaxation, a moral relaxation that is helpful.”
“I find that she, George Eliot, manages to sympathize or make sympathetic almost everyone in that novel... we can sort of figure out why they deserve our attention and our sympathy.”
“Her intelligence and just her presence kind of presiding over this work... being in her intelligence for that period while you're reading it is a very uplifting feeling.”
“In the case of King Lear, it's a vicious flexibility that allows people to be treated as just tools or expedients or means to an end. But in Measure for Measure, treating people like a means to an end actually produces a kind of relaxation, a moral relaxation that is helpful.”
Host
Guests
Shakespeare
person
David Womersley
person
Jack Wilson
person
King Lear
other
Measure for Measure
other
Ramie Targoff
person
The History of Literature
media
Macbeth
other
Middlemarch
other
Cheez-It
brand
789 The 25 Greatest Books of All Time (with Mike Palindrome) | My Last Book with Cass Sunstein
The History of Literature • 1h 16m • 4/2/2026
790 Madness and Myth (with Natasha Joukovsky) | My Last Book with Kimberly Lau
The History of Literature • 58m • 4/6/2026
791 Emilia Lanier (a.k.a Aemilia Bassano Lanyer) Revisited
The History of Literature • 1h 7m • 4/9/2026
792 Death and Decay in Early Modern Lyric Poetry (with Eileen Sperry) | My Last Book with Bruce Gordon
The History of Literature • 1h 1m • 4/13/2026
793 The Secret Order of Shandeans: Laurence Sterne in Early Soviet Russia (with Peter Budrin) | My Last Book with Edward Watts
The History of Literature • 48m • 4/16/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
