Trump’s Pick for Attorney General Is Even Worse Than You Think

The Bulwark22mJune 10, 2026
AI-Generated Summary

The hosts of The Bulwark deliver a scathing critique of Todd Blanche’s nomination as Attorney General, arguing that he is not just politically dangerous but demonstrably unfit due to a pattern of ethical breaches, incompetence, and abuse of power. Sarah Longwell and Andrew Weissman expose Blanche’s role in multiple controversial DOJ actions—ranging from the vindictive prosecution of James Comey and Letitia James to the disastrous slush fund scheme and the unethical release of Epstein’s files with victims’ identities exposed. They highlight how Blanche repeatedly made false public statements, such as falsely claiming the Southern Poverty Law Center was a terrorist group, and oversaw cases dismissed by judges for being brought in bad faith. The episode underscores the unprecedented threat Blanche poses to the independence of the DOJ, warning that confirming him would institutionalize political revenge under the guise of law enforcement. The hosts call on Republican senators to stop enabling Trump’s power grab by refusing to rubber-stamp Blanche, framing the confirmation vote as a moral litmus test for the Senate’s integrity. The discussion also reveals the broader dysfunction in the DOJ under Trump’s influence, including obstructing state investigations into police shootings in Minnesota and undermining federal oversight mechanisms. Weissman emphasizes that Blanche’s nomination isn’t just about one man—it’s about a systemic collapse of accountability.

Key Takeaways
1

Todd Blanche oversaw multiple DOJ cases dismissed for being vindictive, including those against James Comey and Letitia James, proving a pattern of political abuse of justice.

2

Blanche falsely claimed the Southern Poverty Law Center was a terrorist group on Fox News, then had to retract it—showing both incompetence and recklessness.

3

The DOJ under Blanche issued subpoenas to the Federal Reserve that a judge quashed for bad faith, a rare move indicating the investigation lacked legitimacy.

4

Blanche approved the release of Epstein’s files with victims’ names exposed, a decision that traumatized survivors and violated ethical standards.

5

He has repeatedly obstructed state investigations, including denying Minnesota access to federal evidence after police shootings—undermining accountability.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Introducing the Hosts and the Episode's Urgency

This guy should be unconfirmable. There shouldn't even be a debate.

Highlight
2:23
3 min

The Two Buckets of Blanche’s Unfitness: Immoral and Incompetent

It's both outrageous that the Southern Poverty Law Center got indicted for what it did, but then there's also his incompetence in terms of saying something that is completely factually baseless and then having to retract it.

Highlight
5:33
5 min

Blanche’s Role in the Stormy Daniels Case and Loss of Credibility

The hosts dissect Blanche’s performance in the Stormy Daniels case, where he failed to make compelling arguments and lost credibility with the court. Despite winning the case, Weissman argues that Blanche’s lack of presence and poor legal strategy revealed his inadequacy as a top prosecutor.

10:09
5 min

The DOJ Under Blanche: A Department of Political Retribution

There are people who worked under Republican and Democratic administrations. None of us ever have a situation where you issue a grand jury subpoena, and the court says I'm quashing it because it's done in bad faith.

Highlight
14:48
4 min

Obstructing Justice: The Minnesota Police Shooting Case

Why would you obstruct the state from doing an independent investigation? And so. There are so many things that are on Todd Blanche's list of things that are outrageous.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
This is why I'm all rip shit about this now, is this guy should be unconfirmable. There shouldn't even be a debate.
Andrew Weissman11:32
There are people who worked under Republican and Democratic administrations. None of us ever have a situation where you issue a grand jury subpoena, and the court says I'm quashing it because it's done in bad faith.
Andrew Weissman14:35
If they're not going to just do the right thing to take their oaths seriously, it's how do you make this? And this really is now my question to you.
Sarah Longwell21:49
Speakers

Hosts

Sarah LongwellAndrew Weissman
Topics Discussed
attorney general nomination95%doj misconduct90%political prosecutions88%epstein files release85%state federal cooperation80%senate confirmation process75%judicial independence70%ethics oversight65%
People & Brands

Todd Blanche

person

28xNegative

Sarah Longwell

person

12xNeutral

Andrew Weissman

person

11xNeutral

James Comey

person

6xNegative

Stormy Daniels

person

5xNeutral

Letitia James

person

5xNegative

Southern Poverty Law Center

organization

4xNegative

Ghislaine Maxwell

person

4xNegative

Susan Collins

person

4xNegative

Minnesota

place

4xNeutral

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime