Anti-ICE Protesters in Minnesota Charged with Conspiracy

It Could Happen Here38mJune 17, 2026
AI-Generated Summary

The U.S. federal government has indicted 15 individuals from the Twin Cities for conspiracy related to protests at the Whipple Federal Building, the Midwest headquarters of ICE. The indictment, spanning 94 pages, alleges that members of Direct Action Minnesota (DAM) conspired to obstruct federal immigration enforcement through tactics like creating shield walls and attempting to flip trailers—actions that, while disruptive, are largely protected under the First Amendment. Yet the charges hinge on the claim that these lawful activities were part of a broader agreement to commit unlawful acts, a legal framework that critics argue weaponizes free speech and organizing. The episode unpacks how the government’s narrative frames peaceful protest as violent conspiracy, particularly by targeting the term 'anarchist' as a moral and legal red flag, despite its actual meaning being about decentralized, non-hierarchical community care. The hosts emphasize that the real danger isn’t the protesters—but the state’s use of overbroad conspiracy charges to criminalize resistance to unlawful federal power, especially in a city where community solidarity has already proven resilient. Despite federal overreach, the episode ends on a note of cautious hope: the arraignments were marked by massive public turnout, legal infrastructure is strong, and the community’s unity remains unbroken.

Key Takeaways
1

The indictment against 15 Twin Cities protesters is built on First Amendment-protected conduct, including organizing, shield walls, and public observation of ICE—actions that are not crimes.

2

The government’s use of 'conspiracy' charges allows it to criminalize lawful protest by framing coordinated, peaceful actions as evidence of illegal intent.

3

The term 'anarchist' is weaponized in the indictment to imply violence and chaos, despite anarchism’s actual focus on community care, mutual aid, and decentralized decision-making.

4

The indictment’s 276 allegations are overwhelmingly about organizing—like vetting members and using Signal chats—which are standard practices in social movements.

5

The federal government’s narrative of 'good vs. bad' protesters is a deliberate strategy to divide movements, but it’s failing in Minneapolis due to deep community solidarity.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
2:26
2 min

Introducing the Indictment and the Twin Cities Context

James introduces the episode’s focus: the federal indictment of 15 individuals from the Twin Cities for conspiracy related to protests at the Whipple Federal Building. Maura Meltzer-Cohen and Olive provide foundational context, emphasizing the historical significance of Fort Snelling and the Whipple building as sites of ongoing federal occupation and resistance.

4:12
2 min

Historical Violence at Fort Snelling and the Whipple Building

The United States federal government is continuing to perpetuate its violent occupation in the exact same place as I think the largest mass execution in U.S. history, which was a mass execution of Dakota people that after it was carried out was determined to have been totally unlawful.

Highlight
8:19
2 min

Decoding the Indictment: What’s Alleged and What’s Not

The episode dissects the 94-page indictment, which focuses on two blockade actions at the Whipple building and coordination of 'ICE watching' from March to June. The charges center on conspiracy to obstruct federal immigration enforcement through force, intimidation, and threats.

10:10
3 min

The First Amendment in the Crosshairs

They're clearly spending the overwhelming majority talking about other things. Gives it claims, Moe. Is that a reasonable way to refer to them? They said allegations. Allegations. There you go.

Highlight
18:32
4 min

How Conspiracy Charges Criminalize Lawful Protest

What is the thing that's allegedly removing the First Amendment protection from these behaviors? is this claim that all of these things are being done in the service of a larger agreement to do something illegal.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
And so even the indictment itself Even from the government's own narration, you can see that what is at stake for the community in Minneapolis is true life or death stakes. And what is at stake for the ICE agents is that they are inconvenienced all morning.
Margaret29:36
I like to define anarchism as building ways to take care of people that don't reinforce ways to control people, which includes guarding kindergartens, right?
Olive40:00
And so what is the thing that's allegedly removing the First Amendment protection from these behaviors? is this claim that all of these things are being done in the service of this larger agreement to do something illegal.
Maura Meltzer-Cohen21:06
Speakers

Host

James

Guests

Maura Meltzer-CohenOliveMargaret
Topics Discussed
ice resistance95%first amendment rights92%federal conspiracy charges90%protest organizing88%fort snelling87%anarchism and mutual aid85%whipple building80%operational security in protests75%
People & Brands

Margaret

person

12xNeutral

ice

organization

10xNegative

minneapolis

place

10xNeutral

Maura Meltzer-Cohen

person

8xNeutral

Olive

person

7xNeutral

whipple building

place

6xNeutral

direct action minnesota

organization

5xNeutral

signal

product

4xNeutral

fort snelling

place

4xNegative

dakota people

other

3xNegative

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime