Anti-ICE Protesters in Minnesota Charged with Conspiracy
The U.S. federal government has indicted 15 individuals from the Twin Cities for conspiracy related to protests at the Whipple Federal Building, the Midwest headquarters of ICE. The indictment, spanning 94 pages, alleges that members of Direct Action Minnesota (DAM) conspired to obstruct federal immigration enforcement through tactics like creating shield walls and attempting to flip trailers—actions that, while disruptive, are largely protected under the First Amendment. Yet the charges hinge on the claim that these lawful activities were part of a broader agreement to commit unlawful acts, a legal framework that critics argue weaponizes free speech and organizing. The episode unpacks how the government’s narrative frames peaceful protest as violent conspiracy, particularly by targeting the term 'anarchist' as a moral and legal red flag, despite its actual meaning being about decentralized, non-hierarchical community care. The hosts emphasize that the real danger isn’t the protesters—but the state’s use of overbroad conspiracy charges to criminalize resistance to unlawful federal power, especially in a city where community solidarity has already proven resilient. Despite federal overreach, the episode ends on a note of cautious hope: the arraignments were marked by massive public turnout, legal infrastructure is strong, and the community’s unity remains unbroken.
The indictment against 15 Twin Cities protesters is built on First Amendment-protected conduct, including organizing, shield walls, and public observation of ICE—actions that are not crimes.
The government’s use of 'conspiracy' charges allows it to criminalize lawful protest by framing coordinated, peaceful actions as evidence of illegal intent.
The term 'anarchist' is weaponized in the indictment to imply violence and chaos, despite anarchism’s actual focus on community care, mutual aid, and decentralized decision-making.
The indictment’s 276 allegations are overwhelmingly about organizing—like vetting members and using Signal chats—which are standard practices in social movements.
The federal government’s narrative of 'good vs. bad' protesters is a deliberate strategy to divide movements, but it’s failing in Minneapolis due to deep community solidarity.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introducing the Indictment and the Twin Cities Context
James introduces the episode’s focus: the federal indictment of 15 individuals from the Twin Cities for conspiracy related to protests at the Whipple Federal Building. Maura Meltzer-Cohen and Olive provide foundational context, emphasizing the historical significance of Fort Snelling and the Whipple building as sites of ongoing federal occupation and resistance.
Historical Violence at Fort Snelling and the Whipple Building
“The United States federal government is continuing to perpetuate its violent occupation in the exact same place as I think the largest mass execution in U.S. history, which was a mass execution of Dakota people that after it was carried out was determined to have been totally unlawful.”
Decoding the Indictment: What’s Alleged and What’s Not
The episode dissects the 94-page indictment, which focuses on two blockade actions at the Whipple building and coordination of 'ICE watching' from March to June. The charges center on conspiracy to obstruct federal immigration enforcement through force, intimidation, and threats.
The First Amendment in the Crosshairs
“They're clearly spending the overwhelming majority talking about other things. Gives it claims, Moe. Is that a reasonable way to refer to them? They said allegations. Allegations. There you go.”
How Conspiracy Charges Criminalize Lawful Protest
“What is the thing that's allegedly removing the First Amendment protection from these behaviors? is this claim that all of these things are being done in the service of a larger agreement to do something illegal.”
“And so even the indictment itself Even from the government's own narration, you can see that what is at stake for the community in Minneapolis is true life or death stakes. And what is at stake for the ICE agents is that they are inconvenienced all morning.”
“I like to define anarchism as building ways to take care of people that don't reinforce ways to control people, which includes guarding kindergartens, right?”
“And so what is the thing that's allegedly removing the First Amendment protection from these behaviors? is this claim that all of these things are being done in the service of this larger agreement to do something illegal.”
Host
Guests
Margaret
person
ice
organization
minneapolis
place
Maura Meltzer-Cohen
person
Olive
person
whipple building
place
direct action minnesota
organization
signal
product
fort snelling
place
dakota people
other
How Trump Lost Public Support for his Immigration Crackdown
26m • 6/9/2026
Trump's Merry-Go-Round - May 29, 2026
2h 34m • 5/30/2026
It Could Happen Here Weekly 234
3h 32m • 5/30/2026
It Could Happen Here Weekly 234
3h 32m • 5/30/2026
Not All Hauntings Are the Same, Part Two | Grave Talks CLASSIC
29m • 5/31/2026
CZM Book Club: The End, Like Sand, by Margaret Killjoy
35m • 5/31/2026
Bears! And the Guys Who Don’t Like Them
1h 17m • 6/1/2026
How to Potluck Your Way to a Union
43m • 6/2/2026
The War on Iran and Convergences of Fascism
26m • 6/4/2026
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime

